The Lead-Acid batts will do their 400 cycles in about 15 months anyway

Johny wrote: Need 90 Amps for 60 seconds (I'm going to regard this as continuous as it is not really "peak") but this may rise to 130 Amps once the car is on the road and I start "playing".
... So to get close to the target range, 20ah cells are required.
Lithium 20Ah cells are usually low-rate discharge - limited to 3C or 60 Amps. High rate Lithium cells are almost double the low-rate price per Ah.
...Anyway, I have a feeling that others are in the same boat as me - hemonster for one.
The 30Ah cells that weber/coulomb are pursuing may be interesting but I haven't seen a price yet.
Indeed a quick decision, can you PN me the specifications - or email me a hemonster at gmail. 40Ah would be nice, but we're talking ~USD$10K for a 600V cell stack, - a 20Ah would be ideal for me at that price. Also isn't the weight going to be an issues for 600V, or are you guys using a lower voltage?[/quote]coulomb wrote:
What about Sky Energy 40 Ah SE series? They are 4C continuous, 12C pulse. 4C is 80A, pretty close to your "continuous" requirement, and there is a long way to 12 C*, so 90 A would not stress them very much. Sky energy are one of the suppliers of Thunder Sky cells, so they seem to know their stuff. Well, I guess we'll know in 4-6 weeks when the cells come through; Weber and I are now committed to these. US$1.1 per Ah via the bulk order; 27% less than the China HiPower high discharge rate cells (US$1.5 per Ah).
...
Hemonster, would these suit your application? Either of you may be able to piggy back on the bulk buy still (since we've "opened the 40 Ah door" now), but I think you'd have to be quick. I know it's a hell of a decision to make in a hurry.
Alas, there is nothing smaller than 40 Ah at this stage.Hemonster wrote: Indeed a quick decision, can you PM me the specifications - or email me a hemonster at gmail. 40Ah would be nice, but we're talking ~USD$10K for a 600V cell stack, - a 20Ah would be ideal for me at that price.
Yes, weight is an issue. No, we're not going with lower voltage; we're going with 208 cells, 624V nominal. That's over 300 kg for the cells alone, plus battery boxes etc. We will have to upgrade the car's differential, brakes, and suspension to cater for the additional weight. So yes, for a small car, this isn't ideal. We are lucky that bolt-in stronger differentials (with the right ratio) and brake components are available for the 1.8 L version of our 1.6 L car. Suspension components are pretty standard.Also isn't the weight going to be an issues for 600V, or are you guys using a lower voltage?
coulomb wrote:Alas, there is nothing smaller than 40 Ah at this stage.Hemonster wrote: Indeed a quick decision, can you PM me the specifications - or email me a hemonster at gmail. 40Ah would be nice, but we're talking ~USD$10K for a 600V cell stack, - a 20Ah would be ideal for me at that price.
Their web page is out of date; they don't even have the info for the 40 Ah SE cells up yet. So we have to infer it from the other size cells... but the information (relative to Ah capacity) is the same up to 180 Ah.
The specs for the 180 Ah cells (the only ones with a discharge curve so far:)
http://www.skyenergy.com.cn/EnProductShow.asp?ID=4
The size of the Sky Energy SE 40 Ah cell is the exact same as the Thunder Sky 40 Ah.
The lack of real data is frustrating, and needs to be considered in the purchase decision. Also, setting the minimum discharge voltage at 2.0 V seems at least unusual. Maybe their different chemistry can handle this; maybe it just inflates the capacity figures at the expense of cell life.
Sorry I have forgotten. What is the difference between the 2 cells (38120L and 38120S)?Headway wrote:.... 140mm means use 38120L cell, and height 160mm means use 38120S cell.
Lorraine, are they two alternative sizes for the Al-alloy 60V 20AH?Headway wrote:Sorry,The size of 60V20AH Al-alloy material box is L*W*H:465×160×152(mm)/345*160*221(mm),