coulomb wrote: Wed, 19 Feb 2020, 14:45
antiscab wrote: Wed, 19 Feb 2020, 12:58 The surprising part for me was how much lower the no load back emf was compared to the battery voltage, when supposedly at maximum speed.
I wonder if it's using a lot of field weakening to get a wide constant power region. But the difference between phases is very surprising to me too.
I assume it's a permanent magnet motor?
yes perm magnet motor, and yes the MC uses field weakening.
when riding, max DC bus current draw peaks at 220A (which is awfully close to the IGBT 6-pack max 300A) at 70kmh, above which it enters a constant power region.
I always assumed this was where field weakening started.
I'm now wondering whether it is the transition from field strengthening to field weakening, and the permanent magnets aren't that strong (maybe to improve efficiency at part load)
On another note, I have done some more testing today.
testing body diodes on the IGBT 6-pack showed all upper and lower to be 0.35v drop, with reverse polarity checking out as above what my DMM can measure.
So that suggests the IGBT's themselves are likely okay.
I did a separate test, measuring AC voltage between phases, and between individual phase terminals and batt +/- whilst motor was not connected, but MC powered up and motor spinning (by foot action).
I measured a varying AC voltage in all scenarios, except between phase 1 and batt - terminal. That stayed resolutely at 0v (well hovering around 0.2vac, but that's a 0 point issue with my DMM I think)
That tells me the low side IGBT on phase 1 isn't conducting.
now to test the gate driver signal (after I look up the IGBT spec sheet to work out which terminal is supposed to be triggered)
EDIT: no vac between batt - and phase 1 terminal would suggest high side IGBT (between + and phase 1 terminal) to not be conducting.
EDIT2: I would also have to check the 15V gate drive power supply, as the high sides each have their own
EDIT3: IGBT module in question:
https://www.digchip.com/datasheets/part ... 60-pdf.php