Brendon_m Moke

Post up a thread for your EV. Progress pics, description and assorted alliteration
User avatar
brendon_m
Senior Member
Posts: 598
Joined: Sat, 28 Oct 2017, 11:00
Real Name: Brendon McCarrol

Re: Brendon_m Moke

Post by brendon_m »

Getting up Kalamunda hill might be too much of a test. Well, at a speed that doesn't hold up traffic anyway. At least I'd have regen coming back down...

francisco.shi
Groupie
Posts: 363
Joined: Mon, 17 Sep 2018, 16:30
Real Name: Francisco
Location: Brisbane, Strathpine

Re: Brendon_m Moke

Post by francisco.shi »

I am starting to worry about how much power the Pajero will need at 100kph.

User avatar
brendon_m
Senior Member
Posts: 598
Joined: Sat, 28 Oct 2017, 11:00
Real Name: Brendon McCarrol

Re: Brendon_m Moke

Post by brendon_m »

I'm sure the pajero will be more aerodynamic, it'll be hard for it to be worse.

Well I got home from @jonescg 's house. It took 51% of my usable capacity to go up the highway at 80kmh and then get up the hill but between regen and coasting and sticking to more 60kmh back streets with a shorter run on the highway I pulled back into home with 22% remaining.

francisco.shi
Groupie
Posts: 363
Joined: Mon, 17 Sep 2018, 16:30
Real Name: Francisco
Location: Brisbane, Strathpine

Re: Brendon_m Moke

Post by francisco.shi »

The pajero is 2400kg, has 4 really wide high profile tyres, two right angle diffs and a limited slip diff on the back. The back is also very square.
So I am starting to be (very) concerned. I am just hoping that the 60kph consumption will not be too high.

User avatar
brendon_m
Senior Member
Posts: 598
Joined: Sat, 28 Oct 2017, 11:00
Real Name: Brendon McCarrol

Re: Brendon_m Moke

Post by brendon_m »

Did some rudimentary weighing last night with the new bathroom scales. (don't tell my wife)
The weights are still a bit lopsided and I'm putting that down to not having the car perfectly level. But still the numbers are rough enough for now. Once I get closer to licencing I'll get it weighed proper.
In the mean time its

LF 185.5kg RF 215.1kg
LR 137.8kg RR 122.2kg

Total weight 660kg
The original weight was 626kg as I weighed it
And the official weight in the manual is 660kg.

User avatar
jonescg
Senior Member
Posts: 3462
Joined: Thu, 21 Jan 2010, 23:05
Real Name: Chris Jones
Location: Perth, WA.

Re: Brendon_m Moke

Post by jonescg »

Yeah, but it was probably down 2 kgs of oil to start with...
AEVA National Secretary, WA branch chair.

User avatar
brendon_m
Senior Member
Posts: 598
Joined: Sat, 28 Oct 2017, 11:00
Real Name: Brendon McCarrol

Re: Brendon_m Moke

Post by brendon_m »

That's unfair, those oil leaks are factory fitted.

User avatar
brendon_m
Senior Member
Posts: 598
Joined: Sat, 28 Oct 2017, 11:00
Real Name: Brendon McCarrol

Re: Brendon_m Moke

Post by brendon_m »

I went to a weigh bridge this morning
I'm pretty happy with my crude measurement of 660kg.
The official weights are -
380kg front
260kg rear
640kg total


Original tare is 660kg so I'm under weight :D
Max gvm is 1004kg so if I ever wanted to upgrade to a 4 seater in the future I still can

In other news I've done a brake test with the engineer now and he said "you're using a lot of force on the pedal but they should be good enough". Which for a moke must mean they are better than factory
Last edited by brendon_m on Mon, 15 Jun 2020, 13:02, edited 2 times in total.

francisco.shi
Groupie
Posts: 363
Joined: Mon, 17 Sep 2018, 16:30
Real Name: Francisco
Location: Brisbane, Strathpine

Re: Brendon_m Moke

Post by francisco.shi »

You can add another 20kg worth of batteries.

User avatar
brendon_m
Senior Member
Posts: 598
Joined: Sat, 28 Oct 2017, 11:00
Real Name: Brendon McCarrol

Re: Brendon_m Moke

Post by brendon_m »

Technically I could stuff an extra 200kg of battery in.
1004kg GVM, less 640kg of car and 164kg of people/luggage gives me 200kg spare
The current cells weigh 140kg so if I could find room I could easily double the range. And if I replace all the cells with new undegraded ones I'd double the range again. Not to mention new cells could be both lighter and smaller.

User avatar
jonescg
Senior Member
Posts: 3462
Joined: Thu, 21 Jan 2010, 23:05
Real Name: Chris Jones
Location: Perth, WA.

Re: Brendon_m Moke

Post by jonescg »

But like my scooter - just cause you could go further on it, doesn't mean you'd want to...
AEVA National Secretary, WA branch chair.

User avatar
brendon_m
Senior Member
Posts: 598
Joined: Sat, 28 Oct 2017, 11:00
Real Name: Brendon McCarrol

Re: Brendon_m Moke

Post by brendon_m »

Finally got a trendy piece of paper today :D
IMG_20200615_111040.jpg
IMG_20200615_111040.jpg (1.81 MiB) Viewed 308 times
All went smoothly except the inspector spent a long time looking at the slop in the steering (combination of tie rod ends and the rack itself). I was certain it was going to be a fail but one other the other inspectors who has owned mokes took it for a drive and said "nah, it's actually really good and tight when you compare it to other mokes..."

User avatar
jonescg
Senior Member
Posts: 3462
Joined: Thu, 21 Jan 2010, 23:05
Real Name: Chris Jones
Location: Perth, WA.

Re: Brendon_m Moke

Post by jonescg »

Haha, it's all relative isn't it :) Nice work, and great to see the tally of conversions in WA now at 54.
AEVA National Secretary, WA branch chair.

User avatar
Adverse Effects
Senior Member
Posts: 1101
Joined: Sat, 01 Jan 2011, 03:30
Real Name: Adverse Effects
Location: Brisbane

Re: Brendon_m Moke

Post by Adverse Effects »

dam good to see grats
If you don't have time to do it right,
When will you have time to do it over

Help those who help themselves first

Post Reply