PIP-4048MS and PIP-5048MS inverters

non-EV Solar, Wind and other renewable power sources
non-EV batteries and other energy storage stuff
Forum rules
Important!
This forum is for discussion of Non-EV matters.
Alex_50174
Noobie
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri, 13 Jul 2018, 18:36
Location: Novokuibyshevsk, RU

Re: PIP-4048MS inverter

Post by Alex_50174 » Sat, 14 Jul 2018, 00:20

Hi, coulomb.
coulomb wrote:
Fri, 13 Jul 2018, 21:56
100 A is quite light for two inverters in parallel. It also sounds like they were only AC rated; you need DC rated fuses or breakers there. When they opened at something over their rated current, they may well have arced, pitting the contacts, and that may have interrupted the power to the inverters many times in a fraction of a second. The natural inductance of the battery cables may have caused voltage transients.
Yes, I know that C100 AC breaker is not a good idea for that invertors and I already said to the electrician all I think about he. It should be noted that I only deal with the repair of inverters and they got to me already in a faulty state. I already repaired a month ago the MPPT charger part of one of this inverters when the electrician connected about 7000Wt solar panels to one inverter...
coulomb wrote:
Fri, 13 Jul 2018, 21:56
If you did not replace the original MOSFETs and capacitors, then they were already running very close to their limits. A few rapid inductive spikes could well have sent them into avalanche breakdown.
There are original 75V IRFB3307Z. It is interesting that their appearance is normal, but the leftmost and rightmost transistors are with burnt legs because of the high current. So, it's was a my guess that the voltage raised above 75V for a fraction of a second.
coulomb wrote:
Fri, 13 Jul 2018, 21:56
However, it's also possible that heat caused the capacitors that protect the battery-side MOSFETs to dry and become high impedance, allowing the transients on the 50 V bus to kill those MOSFETs, and the transformer coupled the transients (plus new ones from the short on the 50 V bus) to the DC-DC IGBTs.
I think that it's not a reason. Invertors worked only 1 or 2 month, the capacitors usually do not dry so quickly. Full capacitance of 4 capacitors with unsoldered MOSFETs is 13300 (but I haven't ESR meter so I can not be sure).
Also, my inverters are bit different in some parts from described - capacitors are 3300uF 80V "success" (I guess that it is Chinese noname).
DC-DC and buck IGBTs are FGW50N60HD, inverter bridge IGBTs are FGW75N60HD.
coulomb wrote:
Fri, 13 Jul 2018, 21:56
This is all very speculative; it's hard to know what happens in a breakdown situation unless everything is instrumented and logged in a laboratory situation.
Yes, of course. But users of this invertors said that they not exclude short circuit at the AC output. But I think that if it really was, it couldn't be a reason, it could cause increased load and tripping the battery breaker.
coulomb wrote:
Fri, 13 Jul 2018, 21:56
Edit: you have also likely blown several gate driver parts. See the index (first post this topic) for what to look out for, should you attempt to repair the inverters.
Of course, I will check and repair gate drivers.

Thank you!

User avatar
coulomb
Site Admin
Posts: 3428
Joined: Thu, 22 Jan 2009, 20:32
Real Name: Mike Van Emmerik
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Re: PIP-4048MS inverter

Post by coulomb » Sat, 14 Jul 2018, 08:20

Alex_50174 wrote:
Sat, 14 Jul 2018, 00:20
It should be noted that I only deal with the repair of inverters and they got to me already in a faulty state.
Good to hear that there are other repairers out there. There is such a throw away mentality these days, perhaps more so in the West.
I already repaired a month ago the MPPT charger part of one of this inverters when the electrician connected about 7000Wt solar panels to one inverter...
I would have thought that too many panels would not be such a serious problem. But I suppose the control system has to operate faster with higher power panels (in good light conditions). Good to know, thanks.
There are original 75V IRFB3307Z. It is interesting that their appearance is normal, but the leftmost and rightmost transistors are with burnt legs because of the high current.
Interesting. They seem to be using the original worst-spec MOSFET, except for an added "Z" in the main part of the part number. These "Z" parts have the same or slightly improved specs in most areas, except for pulsed drain current, where it is improved from 120 A (wire bond limited) to 510 A. My guess is that the "Z" versions use some sort of welding technique to connect the package leads to the die, and the non-"Z" versions use traditional wire bonding. So in the non-"Z" versions, you effectively have internal 120 A fuses, and in the "Z" versions, these effective fuses are absent. So the TO-220 leads become the fuse.
coulomb wrote:
Fri, 13 Jul 2018, 21:56
However, it's also possible that heat caused the capacitors that protect the battery-side MOSFETs to dry ...
I think that it's not a reason. Invertors worked only 1 or 2 month, the capacitors usually do not dry so quickly.
Fair enough, but see next.
Also, my inverters are bit different in some parts from described - capacitors are 3300uF 80V "success" (I guess that it is Chinese noname).
Oh. Considering that the original Jamicons were a special order, it seems that someone somewhere has used inferior parts, with inferior ripple current ratings. Is it possible that these are actually clones, not genuine Voltronic Power manufactured?
But users of this invertors said that they not exclude short circuit at the AC output. But I think that if it really was, it couldn't be a reason, it could cause increased load and tripping the battery breaker.
I would guess that shorting the output would affect the 230 V IGBTs more than the other IGBTs and MOSFETs.

[ Edit: added "to connect the package leads to the die". ]
[ Edit: added "with inferior ripple current ratings" .]
Learning how to patch and repair PIP-4048 inverter-chargers and Elcon chargers.

Alex_50174
Noobie
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri, 13 Jul 2018, 18:36
Location: Novokuibyshevsk, RU

Re: PIP-4048MS inverter

Post by Alex_50174 » Sat, 14 Jul 2018, 16:54

coulomb wrote:
Sat, 14 Jul 2018, 08:20
Good to hear that there are other repairers out there. There is such a throw away mentality these days, perhaps more so in the West.
I think that it is all over the World tendention.
coulomb wrote:
Sat, 14 Jul 2018, 08:20
I would have thought that too many panels would not be such a serious problem. But I suppose the control system has to operate faster with higher power panels (in good light conditions). Good to know, thanks.
Maybe it was a manufacturing defect. It burned after first turning on. I have changed a logic chip before gate driver PWM сhip to stop burning transistors.
coulomb wrote:
Sat, 14 Jul 2018, 08:20
Interesting. They seem to be using the original worst-spec MOSFET, except for an added "Z" in the main part of the part number. These "Z" parts have the same or slightly improved specs in most areas, except for pulsed drain current, where it is improved from 120 A (wire bond limited) to 510 A.
As I can see in service manual from first page, there were IRFB3307Z in original inverters too (in older versions). And pulsed drain current for Z - 512A, for non-Z - 510A (from datasheets), so differences are not so big.
coulomb wrote:
Sat, 14 Jul 2018, 08:20
Oh. Considering that the original Jamicons were a special order, it seems that someone somewhere has used inferior parts, with inferior ripple current ratings. Is it possible that these are actually clones, not genuine Voltronic Power manufactured?
Maybe there are a clones. I can see only model name "Inverter 5kVa-48VDC" and there is no a firm name. Inverters were bought at the Aliexpress.
I'll try to measure ESR with PC's audio card. If it will be not big that it will mean good quality of capacitors. If ripple current not enough, ESR will be big I think.

User avatar
Gnome
Noobie
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat, 14 Jul 2018, 22:25
Location: Cape Town, South Africa

Re: PIP-4048MS inverter

Post by Gnome » Sat, 14 Jul 2018, 22:38

Hey all

Anyone tried the new Axpert VMIII or Axpert King?

I don't expect any problems with it doing what it claims. However I'm curious if the existing communication protocol still works with the newer models.

Apologies if this has been answered before, the thread is quite epic in length.

Alex_50174
Noobie
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri, 13 Jul 2018, 18:36
Location: Novokuibyshevsk, RU

Re: PIP-4048MS inverter

Post by Alex_50174 » Tue, 17 Jul 2018, 15:23

Going further with burned inverters. Maybe it will be interesting for someone.
1) Capacitors "success". Tried to measure ESR by audio card at 16MHz and it's about 10-20mOhm. I think this capacitors are good but I can't find a place in the internet where to buy them.
2) Tried to measure optocouplers U1/U2/U3/U4/U12 (PIN8 TO PIN5: 2k PIN7 TO PIN5: 2k in the service manual) - all the values on orders of magnitude greater. It is normal or will be better to change all of them, and, maybe, inv IGBTs?
3) Strange symptom - in the one of inverters the compound holding the toroidal inductor has cracked - maybe there was a heavy vibration.

PS: 1 of 8 capacitors (from 2 inverters) has no capacitance at all. So, quality is not good :)

User avatar
weber
Site Admin
Posts: 2500
Joined: Fri, 23 Jan 2009, 17:27
Real Name: Dave Keenan
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Re: PIP-4048MS inverter

Post by weber » Fri, 20 Jul 2018, 14:22

We finally got around to promoting patched firmware 73.00c from beta to release. The only thing that changed is the first letter of the version number (the release-status letter) from B to L.

We simply edited the original beta post, which can be found here or via the index post.
One of the fathers of MeXy the electric MX-5, along with Coulomb and Newton (Jeff Owen).

PurePower
Noobie
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue, 21 Nov 2017, 00:04
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa

Re: PIP-4048MS inverter

Post by PurePower » Fri, 20 Jul 2018, 18:22

weber wrote:
Fri, 20 Jul 2018, 14:22
We finally got around to promoting patched firmware 73.00c from beta to release. The only thing that changed is the first letter of the version number (the release-status letter) from B to L.

We simply edited the original beta post, which can be found here or via the index post.
Awesome. Great work guys! Much appreciated.

stoianco
Noobie
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat, 28 Jul 2018, 02:17
Real Name: Stoian Alin

Re: PIP-4048MS inverter

Post by stoianco » Sat, 28 Jul 2018, 02:43

Hello All,

About one month ago a team installed me a complete system with a PIP-5048MS.

2 days ago (Wednesday) at 15:42 the solar panels got disconected and have never been reconected ever since! It worked on batteries and I just realized it today. Lucky for me i have big batteries. It has the settings: SBU and Solar only. Now I have moved it to Solar and Solar first to protect the batteries (I'm still ongrid for the time beeing).
Restart, changing parameters, restore parameters to factory default... no way to make it start taking some power from the panels.

I have 12 panels (4 strings of 3 panels) max V is 37.9*3, so no way to have more than 145V.
I have DC breakers between panels and PIP, I have DC breakers between batteries and PIP all looks ok
Today there were 101VDC at the PIP PV entrance - it just didn't care!

There is no error message -> only thing I realized is that I see no secondary CPU version in PowerWatch (?!?) Isn't that exactly the PV controller? Can it just die, while all the others are still working?!?

I have already send an email to support but they have up to 3 working days to reply :(
If any suggestion/ideea... please help!

Thanks a lot in advance!

User avatar
weber
Site Admin
Posts: 2500
Joined: Fri, 23 Jan 2009, 17:27
Real Name: Dave Keenan
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Re: PIP-4048MS inverter

Post by weber » Sat, 28 Jul 2018, 06:37

stoianco wrote:
Sat, 28 Jul 2018, 02:43
There is no error message -> only thing I realized is that I see no secondary CPU version in PowerWatch (?!?) Isn't that exactly the PV controller?
Yes, it is.
Can it just die, while all the others are still working?!?
Yes, it can. The PV controller or SCC (Solar Charge Controller) is a separate circuit board, mounted on top of the heatsinks of the main (inverter/charger) circuit board.. Another possibility is that some cable connecting to the SCC has come loose inside the PIP. You could check this by isolating the PIP from battery, PV array and grid, and taking the cover off, and giving each such connection a wiggle, or unplugging and replugging it.
One of the fathers of MeXy the electric MX-5, along with Coulomb and Newton (Jeff Owen).

stoianco
Noobie
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat, 28 Jul 2018, 02:17
Real Name: Stoian Alin

Re: PIP-4048MS inverter

Post by stoianco » Sat, 28 Jul 2018, 15:11

The unit is one month old, so in waranty period.
Make sense to be just a stupid plug topic, still, because is sealed, I'm not sure if I should open it. :?

paulvk
Groupie
Posts: 158
Joined: Fri, 23 Oct 2015, 23:45
Real Name: Paul
Location: Sydney

Re: PIP-4048MS inverter

Post by paulvk » Sat, 28 Jul 2018, 20:29

What are the panels how many watts?

stoianco
Noobie
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat, 28 Jul 2018, 02:17
Real Name: Stoian Alin

Re: PIP-4048MS inverter

Post by stoianco » Sat, 28 Jul 2018, 23:34

Canadian Solar CS6K-270P 12 pcs (4 strings of 3 pcs in series) => Voc: 37.9*3= 113.7V

paulvk
Groupie
Posts: 158
Joined: Fri, 23 Oct 2015, 23:45
Real Name: Paul
Location: Sydney

Re: PIP-4048MS inverter

Post by paulvk » Sun, 29 Jul 2018, 14:50

I would look into warranty return before opening.
Note I had more panels on one unit at one point but it maxed out at 61amps even though more power was available so it should not have overloaded.

stoianco
Noobie
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat, 28 Jul 2018, 02:17
Real Name: Stoian Alin

Re: PIP-4048MS inverter

Post by stoianco » Sat, 04 Aug 2018, 16:27

After a lot of emails with their support department, they asked me to open it, so I did it. I have find out that the MPPT board is burned out.
Now I'm waiting for their solution to repair it.

Thanks a lot for sugestions and support!

6mdx
Groupie
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue, 23 May 2017, 21:17
Real Name: Robert Black
Location: Lismore

Re: PIP-4048MS inverter

Post by 6mdx » Sun, 05 Aug 2018, 08:43

Hi guys, been absent from the forum for a while.

I have finally "bit the bullet" and ordered 15 Calb 180s.

So my questions relates to setting voltages on my PIP HS 5048.

I note from Calbs spec sheet that:

initial charge 3.8 V,
operating voltage 3.65 V

So what is the best float and absorption settings and what voltage is 80% DOD?

thanks Robert

User avatar
weber
Site Admin
Posts: 2500
Joined: Fri, 23 Jan 2009, 17:27
Real Name: Dave Keenan
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Re: PIP-4048MS inverter

Post by weber » Sun, 05 Aug 2018, 09:23

Hi Robert.

For LFP cells (which CALBs are), Coulomb and I use a float voltage of 3.36 V per cell. The ideal absorb voltage depends on the maximum charge current and the internal resistance of the cell. I use 3.38 V + max_charge_current * internal_resistance. But internal resistance varies enormously with temperature. However you don't have to be too accurate with absorb voltage, since the cells don't spend a lot of time there. 3.50 V per cell is a reasonable compromise in most situations.

There is no voltage that will tell you when your LFP battery is 80% charged. The only states of charge you can reliably determine from voltage are those below 30% or above 95%. If the cells have been rested for at least half an hour and you know whether they were being charged or discharged prior to resting, then you can also tell if they are above or below 75% state of charge*, but that's about it. Some insight into the difficulty of estimating LFP state of charge from voltage (and some graphs of voltage versus SoC) may be found here:
viewtopic.php?f=31&t=4332&p=59994#p59994

* If they were being charged prior to resting, they are above 75% if they're above 3.33 V.
If they were being discharged prior to resting, they are above 75% if they're above 3.31 V.

[Edit note: Changed 3.32 to 3.33 and 3.30 to 3.31 above.]
One of the fathers of MeXy the electric MX-5, along with Coulomb and Newton (Jeff Owen).

User avatar
coulomb
Site Admin
Posts: 3428
Joined: Thu, 22 Jan 2009, 20:32
Real Name: Mike Van Emmerik
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Re: PIP-4048MS inverter

Post by coulomb » Sun, 05 Aug 2018, 10:23

6mdx wrote:
Sun, 05 Aug 2018, 08:43
So what is the best float and absorption settings and what voltage is 80% DOD?
For LFP, 80% DOD (20% SOC) is about 3.21 VPC, or about 48.2 V for 15S. That's rested, after mild discharge, as you would hopefully get in early morning when your battery might be running low.
Learning how to patch and repair PIP-4048 inverter-chargers and Elcon chargers.

User avatar
weber
Site Admin
Posts: 2500
Joined: Fri, 23 Jan 2009, 17:27
Real Name: Dave Keenan
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Re: PIP-4048MS inverter

Post by weber » Sun, 05 Aug 2018, 13:09

Thanks Coulomb. As you probably guessed, I somehow missed the "DOD".

Robert, if you're looking for a low voltage cutoff setting for the PIP, for LFP cells, we use 3.17 V per cell in Brisbane, and 3.13 V per cell in locations further inland where the overnight temperature goes below zero in winter. As rested voltages, those correspond to about 7% and 5% SoC, but there will almost always be some load that takes the voltage below those thresholds at 20% to 40% SoC. And the PIP gives a warning well before that happens.
One of the fathers of MeXy the electric MX-5, along with Coulomb and Newton (Jeff Owen).

curasun
Noobie
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon, 26 Feb 2018, 06:20
Real Name: Rubencito Specht

Re: PIP-4048MS inverter

Post by curasun » Sun, 05 Aug 2018, 18:46

Good day guys,

One quick question, what bms are you using?
I'm planning to build a powerwall of liyhium-ion batteries in 14s configuration.
My concern is most BMS's for lithium ion balance at top at 4.2v and bottom at 2.5v. I don't wanna go to this extremes to prolong battery life. I'm using now a PCM60x and a PIP4048, can I limit the charge and dischage to 4.0v top and 3.0 bottom with the PCM60X AND pip4048 and let the BMS do the rest.

I was looking at this BMS, by Chargery.com, but I don't know if it can use solar as the charging source. but it looks promising.
www.chargery.com

What do you guys think?

Best regards R.G.Specht
From Carribean.

6mdx
Groupie
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue, 23 May 2017, 21:17
Real Name: Robert Black
Location: Lismore

Re: PIP-4048MS inverter

Post by 6mdx » Mon, 06 Aug 2018, 06:38

Weber and Coulomb, thank for the detailed replies. Looking forward to sending the lead to Pb heaven. At close to a ton, it should give me money to buy more toys.

I ordered a BMS from the same WA place as the Calb180s. hopefully it will do the job, but I do wish i had asked you guys first.

cheers Robert

Kimo-23
Noobie
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun, 12 Aug 2018, 09:26

Re: PIP-4048MS inverter

Post by Kimo-23 » Sun, 12 Aug 2018, 09:43

hello to everyone in this forum.
I'm Italian and I'm proud to be with you in this forum.
I have a problem and I hope someone can help me :-)
I have an Opti-solar sp5000 brilliant inverter.
it worked great for 2 years.
I do not know what my dad has done, and the charger board has burned.
I bought it from the parent company (opti-solar) and replaced it.
my problem is when I connect the batteries to start the inverter gives me the error (code 03) (battery over charged), I checked the voltage of the batteries and is 49 volts.
I also tried other batteries and always gave me the same error.
in the display where there is battery information, it gives me a voltage of 119 volts !!!!!
thanks to anyone who can help me to solve the problem.
and sorry for my poor English.
if you need some more information about my inverter, ask.
thank you

User avatar
reecho
Senior Member
Posts: 617
Joined: Sun, 17 Apr 2011, 02:39
Real Name: Richard Baird
Location: Perth WA
Contact:

Re: PIP-4048MS inverter

Post by reecho » Sun, 12 Aug 2018, 20:46

Is there a possibility for custom firmware for the 3024MSE?.

User avatar
weber
Site Admin
Posts: 2500
Joined: Fri, 23 Jan 2009, 17:27
Real Name: Dave Keenan
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Re: PIP-4048MS inverter

Post by weber » Mon, 13 Aug 2018, 07:23

Hi Kimo-23. When you say you replaced the "charger board", do you mean the solar charge controller (SCC) board? Or the main board that contains the AC charger (and inverter)?
One of the fathers of MeXy the electric MX-5, along with Coulomb and Newton (Jeff Owen).

User avatar
weber
Site Admin
Posts: 2500
Joined: Fri, 23 Jan 2009, 17:27
Real Name: Dave Keenan
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Re: PIP-4048MS inverter

Post by weber » Mon, 13 Aug 2018, 07:57

reecho wrote:
Sun, 12 Aug 2018, 20:46
Is there a possibility for custom firmware for the 3024MSE?.
Sorry Reecho, but no. At least not from Coulomb and I. As you can imagine, it is very time-consuming work. Keeping up with PIP-4048MS firmware, and hopefully soon PIP-5048MS firmware, when new versions come out, is as much as we can handle. And even if we wanted to, we don't have a copy of the 3024MSE firmware and we don't have a machine to test it on.
One of the fathers of MeXy the electric MX-5, along with Coulomb and Newton (Jeff Owen).

Kimo-23
Noobie
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun, 12 Aug 2018, 09:26

Re: PIP-4048MS inverter

Post by Kimo-23 » Mon, 13 Aug 2018, 14:33

weber wrote:
Mon, 13 Aug 2018, 07:23
Hi Kimo-23. When you say you replaced the "charger board", do you mean the solar charge controller (SCC) board? Or the main board that contains the AC charger (and inverter)?
Hi Weber thank you for the answer.
replaced the SCC that is located across the top of the inverter.
I also detached the main board and I also checked the diodes and the resistors (following the instructions of the MANUAL SERVICE) it seems that everything is fine, but keeps giving me the error 03.
I would like to try to update the software, can you explain how to do it?
if it can do with the inverter turned off?
thank you so much

Post Reply