PIP-4048MS and PIP-5048MS inverters
Forum rules
Important!
This forum is for discussion of Non-EV matters.
Important!
This forum is for discussion of Non-EV matters.
Re: PIP-4048MS inverter
Hi @coulomb and @weber. First of all I want thank you for your effort and time of answering questions.
I would also like to ask you if I can use your patch to upgrade the firmware of my inverter. Current Main CPU 72.40 / Secondary CPU Version 1.24. I am not also sure if my inverter is manufactured by Voltronics. Please find attached photo and please let me know your thoughts about it.
I would also like to ask you if I can use your patch to upgrade the firmware of my inverter. Current Main CPU 72.40 / Secondary CPU Version 1.24. I am not also sure if my inverter is manufactured by Voltronics. Please find attached photo and please let me know your thoughts about it.
Re: PIP-4048MS inverter
It's the second time I see my inverters reporting a brief surge in PV production the exact moment of the switch from grid to solar. Would this be a freak coincidence, an artifact of the monitoring software (ICC) or just normal physics (that i would like to understand)?
I caught the event from today at 12:10:30 "on camera":
P.S. load was reported constant (not shown on the graph above)
I caught the event from today at 12:10:30 "on camera":
P.S. load was reported constant (not shown on the graph above)
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3183
- Joined: Mon, 26 Nov 2007, 05:39
- Real Name: Matthew Lacey
- Location: Perth, WA
Re: PIP-4048MS inverter
Could it be the panels weren't at max power point until the inverter took some of the load? Likely array output was higher than what the batteries could take?
Matt
2023 BYD Atto 3 - 21k km
2017 Renault zoe - 147'000km
2012 Leaf - 101'000km - soon to be trialing a booster battery
2007 Vectrix - 197'000km (retired)
2007 Vectrix - 50k km
2023 BYD Atto 3 - 21k km
2017 Renault zoe - 147'000km
2012 Leaf - 101'000km - soon to be trialing a booster battery
2007 Vectrix - 197'000km (retired)
2007 Vectrix - 50k km
Re: PIP-4048MS inverter
Thanks, that could have been an explanation as I haven't provided all the data: the power generated at the moment was well below the maximum charge current * battery voltage and the batteries were not full. Plus that the power level just spiked, shouldn't it have staid up after the inverter took the load?
Anyway, it was just a harmless spike on the graph that made me question my understanding of the system
- coulomb
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6357
- Joined: Thu, 22 Jan 2009, 20:32
- Real Name: Mike Van Emmerik
- Location: Brisbane
- Contact:
Re: PIP-4048MS inverter
Those are moderately old firmware versions, but it should be safe to update the main firmware to 73.00c. Don't use factory firmware 73.00, as it will think it's running on a clone and will stop working after 60 days. Also, we went to some trouble in the patched firmware to support older SCC firmware versions, including 1.24. I don't recall if the factory firmware was so accommodating. If for some reason you don't want to use patched firmware, it should be safe to update to 72.70, or 72.90 if you can find it. Our patched firmware files always have the original firmware in the zip file, e.g. dsp_original_72.70.hex. To update to factory firmware, copy this file over the top of dsp.hex and run the reflash tool.
It looks genuine to me, but the clones may be getting better at copying. Also, my impression is that most of the non-obvious clones come with much more recent firmware, so that also indicates (but doesn't prove) authenticity.I am not also sure if my inverter is manufactured by Voltronics.
MG ZS EV 2021 April 2021. Nissan Leaf 2012 with new battery May 2019.
5650 W solar, 2xPIP-4048MS inverters, 16 kWh battery.
Patching PIP-4048/5048 inverter-chargers.
If you appreciate my work, you can buy me a coffee.
5650 W solar, 2xPIP-4048MS inverters, 16 kWh battery.
Patching PIP-4048/5048 inverter-chargers.
If you appreciate my work, you can buy me a coffee.
Re: PIP-4048MS inverter
hey guys,
do you have any idea that if i use POPnn to switch the inverter to grid/battery few times / day, will be written to EPROM and decrease the number of writes ?
thanks
do you have any idea that if i use POPnn to switch the inverter to grid/battery few times / day, will be written to EPROM and decrease the number of writes ?
thanks
- coulomb
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6357
- Joined: Thu, 22 Jan 2009, 20:32
- Real Name: Mike Van Emmerik
- Location: Brisbane
- Contact:
Re: PIP-4048MS inverter
Yes, each Pxxx command including a POP command will cause a write to the EEPROM. But it's a separate chip from the processor, so it could be replaced cheaply if needed, but it has a long rated wear life anyway. See also where this was discussed earlier, accessible from the index in the first post of this topic.
Edit: if you sent 4 extra commands every hour, day and night, even with other usage, one million writes comes to over ten years.
MG ZS EV 2021 April 2021. Nissan Leaf 2012 with new battery May 2019.
5650 W solar, 2xPIP-4048MS inverters, 16 kWh battery.
Patching PIP-4048/5048 inverter-chargers.
If you appreciate my work, you can buy me a coffee.
5650 W solar, 2xPIP-4048MS inverters, 16 kWh battery.
Patching PIP-4048/5048 inverter-chargers.
If you appreciate my work, you can buy me a coffee.
Re: PIP-4048MS inverter
What indicators would prove authenticity?coulomb wrote: ↑Sat, 23 Jun 2018, 08:03It looks genuine to me, but the clones may be getting better at copying. Also, my impression is that most of the non-obvious clones come with much more recent firmware, so that also indicates (but doesn't prove) authenticity.I am not also sure if my inverter is manufactured by Voltronics.
Re: PIP-4048MS inverter
ICC does not yet make use of the Dynamic Current Control feature of the firmware but it does interface into the Pylontech batteries using the Console(RS232) port. It can pull important data like SOC, batt temp, batt cycles, ah remaining, voltage, watts and amps which is displayed in ICC. This at least allows you to automatically change between grid and solar based on SOC.coulomb wrote: ↑Tue, 19 Jun 2018, 19:34I believe that ICC can or soon might be interfacing directly to the Pylontech CAN or RS232 bus.
Check this thread on the PowerForum (I didn't find out whether ICC can talk to the Pylontechs directly yet with a quick search), or ask there. I don't use either Pylontech batteries or ICC.
- coulomb
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6357
- Joined: Thu, 22 Jan 2009, 20:32
- Real Name: Mike Van Emmerik
- Location: Brisbane
- Contact:
Re: PIP-4048MS inverter
That's an interesting question. There are commands you can send it to determine whether the main firmware is from Voltronic, and others to check if the bootloader is the latest Voltronic version, but a correct response could just mean a clone maker has copied the firmware exactly (and illegally). But I suppose that such a correct response indicates a certain level of authenticity.
To me it's weird that Voltronic Power don't put their name on their products. They let the third parties put their names and even model numbers on their products. I think that just leads to confusion. I suppose they do it so they don't ever have to deal with end-users. So the distributors are supposed to add some mark-up to cover support. But they are competing with the other distributors, who might not add much for support, and therefore take away some of their sales. So it's a race to the bottom, and support is typically (but not universally) awful. That's part of why this topic exists; the users have to do a lot of their own support.
To answer your question, I can't think of any factor that would prove authenticity. You just have to know from others' previous experiences that supplier X sells authentic hardware and offers reasonable support.
MG ZS EV 2021 April 2021. Nissan Leaf 2012 with new battery May 2019.
5650 W solar, 2xPIP-4048MS inverters, 16 kWh battery.
Patching PIP-4048/5048 inverter-chargers.
If you appreciate my work, you can buy me a coffee.
5650 W solar, 2xPIP-4048MS inverters, 16 kWh battery.
Patching PIP-4048/5048 inverter-chargers.
If you appreciate my work, you can buy me a coffee.
Re: PIP-4048MS inverter
Hi Johan.JvdSpoel wrote: ↑Tue, 28 Feb 2017, 00:36 Hi All,
Error Code 51
I got a couple of Axpert 5MKS inverters which I have replaced with new one's for customers which gave me a Error 51. The inverters still work but will come up with the error intermittently.
I would like to repair these one's so that I can use them for swopout units - anybody who have had these problems and repaired the mainboard who can assist? Which components are the probable cause - the IGBTs or Mosfets. Since they are working I assume that it could be component failure which is busy to happen.
The service manual does not give a lot of information about the error and what needs to be replaced. Like a error 09 I know that the IGBTs and mosfets had gone.
Johan
Sorry for this refloat, but I have a 4048MS with Error 51 and exactly same behavior. When disconnecting the solar panels, it seems to work ok for a few days, but after 3-5 days the error re-occur. So it seems to me that it's an "overcurrent" read for some sensor. When PV is connected the current is higher and more probably to occur. But without them still occur.
Did you be able to solve the Error 51? How?
I have the same problem with a 4048MS (almost 4 years old, with original firmware).
Regards
[ Edited Coulomb: Removed near-duplicate post by combining two. ]
- coulomb
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6357
- Joined: Thu, 22 Jan 2009, 20:32
- Real Name: Mike Van Emmerik
- Location: Brisbane
- Contact:
Re: PIP-4048MS inverter
Last time I read the firmware related to error 51 (fault code 51) in this post, I seemed to think it was associated with a 192 A limit. Upon reviewing the code now, I see I was confusing samples with amps (these differ by a factor of 25). It occurs after reading either of two current samples, and occurs when the sample exceeds an "overcurrent limit". This limit starts out at 40 A, but is increased to 80 A when in battery mode and nothing bad goes wrong. The error only happens when the current limit has been increased to 80 A. There are two AC current sensors, I believe that one measures inverter current, and the other measures load current. I assume that these currents are instantaneous, not RMS. Even so, 80 A peak translates to abut 56 A RMS for a sine wave, which at 230 V is some 13 kVA. There is a separate current limit (not called the "over" current limit, just the ordinary limit, which starts at 32 A and increases to 65 A. 65 A peak translates to 50 A RMS, which represents 10.5 kVA, just over the Volt-Amp limit for the inverter (overload allowed for 10 seconds). So a reading of ≥80 A is pretty bad, and hence it triggers fault code 51.
I don't understand why disconnecting solar panels would have any effect. Perhaps it's merely co-incidental, although another poster also mentioned the connection.When disconnecting the solar panels, it seems to work ok for a few days, but after 3-5 days the error re-occur.
That agrees with my reading of the firmware. Assuming that nothing catastrophic is happening, such as an intermittent short circuit of the inverter or load outputs (perhaps a protection MOV is breaking down prematurely), it has to be either the Hall Effect sensor (blue), or the current transformer (looks much like many of the other transformers, with yellow tape over the windings). Or of course the circuits associated with those sensors; presumably there are filter and amplifier components.So it seems to me that it's an "overcurrent" read for some sensor.
[ Edit: Quick note re 192 A confusion. ]
MG ZS EV 2021 April 2021. Nissan Leaf 2012 with new battery May 2019.
5650 W solar, 2xPIP-4048MS inverters, 16 kWh battery.
Patching PIP-4048/5048 inverter-chargers.
If you appreciate my work, you can buy me a coffee.
5650 W solar, 2xPIP-4048MS inverters, 16 kWh battery.
Patching PIP-4048/5048 inverter-chargers.
If you appreciate my work, you can buy me a coffee.
Re: PIP-4048MS inverter
hey guys,
i'm thinking of switching off the PIPs during night and switch them on in the morning, i have 3 PIPs and i don't like the consumption of ~3 amps .
do you think its ok to do that ? also what do you think will be the best solution for that, i'm thinking at switching load to grid, wait a couple of minutes and then switch off the inverters or just switch off the inverters and have a bypass that will transfer the load to the grid when the inverter doesn't output any power ?
Thanks
IonutD
i'm thinking of switching off the PIPs during night and switch them on in the morning, i have 3 PIPs and i don't like the consumption of ~3 amps .
do you think its ok to do that ? also what do you think will be the best solution for that, i'm thinking at switching load to grid, wait a couple of minutes and then switch off the inverters or just switch off the inverters and have a bypass that will transfer the load to the grid when the inverter doesn't output any power ?
Thanks
IonutD
- coulomb
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6357
- Joined: Thu, 22 Jan 2009, 20:32
- Real Name: Mike Van Emmerik
- Location: Brisbane
- Contact:
Re: PIP-4048MS inverter
That's the way that Weber and I have arranged our energy systems. Personally, I find it extremely convenient. Any time I need to work on the PIP inverter, I just isolate as needed, and the power stays on. If something really high stress happens to a battery cell, the Battery Management System will drop out the PIP system, and this final changeover contactor ensures that power stays on. Even if I need to hit the big red switch on the energy system, which drops out some 7 contactors, the power stays on to the house.
Of course, this contactor is also a parasitic load, which is normally supplied by the battery at night. But it's not a huge load, and it's mostly inductive, so the drain on the battery is much less than from one PIP inverter. Plus, there is the peace of mind from continuous power. I've never had a computer reset due to changeovers, either inside the PIP, or due to the external changeover contactor. My external contactor is a Hager ES470, rated at 63 A. Your electrician needs to know how to wire something like that, but I imagine that most would. It has two normally open contacts and two normally closed. The neutral from the inverter is switched, but not the supply neutral. The contactor takes up 3 17.5 mm bays in the house switchbox.
[ Edit: relay - > contactor, has 2 sets of NO and NC contacts.]
MG ZS EV 2021 April 2021. Nissan Leaf 2012 with new battery May 2019.
5650 W solar, 2xPIP-4048MS inverters, 16 kWh battery.
Patching PIP-4048/5048 inverter-chargers.
If you appreciate my work, you can buy me a coffee.
5650 W solar, 2xPIP-4048MS inverters, 16 kWh battery.
Patching PIP-4048/5048 inverter-chargers.
If you appreciate my work, you can buy me a coffee.
Re: PIP-4048MS inverter
Yes. Crude, but effective
Sorry, that was a bit obscure. The active is switched between the inverter and the grid, and the neutral to the inverter disconnects when in there is no inverter output, but the load always connects to grid neutral.
Re: PIP-4048MS inverter
If I read the above correctly in your setup the grid neutral will be connected to the inverters' output neutral when the load is powered by the inverters ? And this will stay true for both bypass mode and battery/solar mode.
The company that performed the installation warned that in battery mode the neutral is "floating" and I could have trouble using devices that expect true zero potential neutral line (e.g. certain type of flame detectors). Moreover they stated that a true 4p switch-over switch should be used and not a 3P+N that has the N permanently connected to one of the sources.
Connecting the the various neutrals to the same reference (grid neutral) sounds like good practice to me as long as the inverters don't mind. To complicate things more there is the option to have neutral tied to ground by the inverters when in battery mode: i guess with your setup that option needs to stay off ?!
Thanks for educating me with all this! Reading this thread alone has been a tremendous jump-start for me. In time I hope I will be able to contribute to it.
For now I can report my experience running 73.00c on all 3 inverters without issues (3 days now). I will also warn others against performing the upgrade with the grid connected to the inverters: for 2 out of 3 inverters the flashing went on without issues, the 3rd one started extremely slow (more than 1h to 40%) and kept dropping out of the process at various percentages. Re-trying would usually resume the flashing (just as slow) until at 65% dropped out and resumed at ... 30%. By that time it was obvious it might never finish, so I cut all power to it, turned it on on battery only (no LCD by now) and the flashing went on flawlessly and just as fast as the other 2 had been: 9blocks/s.
Re: PIP-4048MS inverter
i had the same issue with one of the inverters and both grid and solar were disconnected and no load on the inverter, had to restart and flash again.charliefd wrote: ↑Thu, 05 Jul 2018, 21:36
I will also warn others against performing the upgrade with the grid connected to the inverters: for 2 out of 3 inverters the flashing went on without issues, the 3rd one started extremely slow (more than 1h to 40%) and kept dropping out of the process at various percentages. Re-trying would usually resume the flashing (just as slow) until at 65% dropped out and resumed at ... 30%. By that time it was obvious it might never finish, so I cut all power to it, turned it on on battery only (no LCD by now) and the flashing went on flawlessly and just as fast as the other 2 had been: 9blocks/s.
- coulomb
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6357
- Joined: Thu, 22 Jan 2009, 20:32
- Real Name: Mike Van Emmerik
- Location: Brisbane
- Contact:
Re: PIP-4048MS inverter
Yes, that's right.
It's true that for models that came with firmware before 73.00, there is no connection from inverter neutral output to earth under any conditions. However, in the models that come with 73.00, [ edit 2021: and in basically all later models, ] there is a new changeover relay that connects the inverter neutral either to earth when in battery mode, or to the AC input neutral otherwise. I can't find anything in the firmware that operates this new relay, so I now assume that the neutral to earth relay switches when the inverter output relay switches. [ Edit 2021: Actually, it's an extra contact on the neutral "safety" relay, connecting AC-out-N to either AC-in-N or earth. ] However, the changeover relay seems to have a normally closed connection with earth that changes load neutral to connect to AC input neutral when the coil is energised. So this new relay [ contact ] connects load neutral to earth when the power is off.The company that performed the installation warned that in battery mode the neutral is "floating" and I could have trouble ...
We don't have an external relay to connect AC out neutral to earth when the dry contact signal is on, no. When you use the dry contact option, you have to provide the relay yourself, external to the inverter-charger case.To complicate things more there is the option to have neutral tied to ground by the inverters when in battery mode: i guess with your setup that option needs to stay off ?!
[ Edit: the new neutral to earth relay has changeover contacts. Also reworded. ]
[ Edit 2021: it's not a new relay; more rewording. ]
MG ZS EV 2021 April 2021. Nissan Leaf 2012 with new battery May 2019.
5650 W solar, 2xPIP-4048MS inverters, 16 kWh battery.
Patching PIP-4048/5048 inverter-chargers.
If you appreciate my work, you can buy me a coffee.
5650 W solar, 2xPIP-4048MS inverters, 16 kWh battery.
Patching PIP-4048/5048 inverter-chargers.
If you appreciate my work, you can buy me a coffee.
- weber
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2936
- Joined: Fri, 23 Jan 2009, 17:27
- Real Name: Dave Keenan
- Location: Brisbane
- Contact:
Re: PIP-4048MS inverter
A picture can be worth a thousand words. Coulomb kindly pointed me to an early schematic showing an early arrangement of the AC relays in the PIP-4048MS. [Edit: The later arrangement, still prior to firmware version 73.00, has only 3 relays. It seems the inverter relay is omitted.] Below is my best guess at the present (73.00) arrangement, that connects neutral to earth when in battery mode.
This is based on the fact that there are still only 4 relays, but one of them has changed from normally-open to changeover. I assume it is the one that was already switching the neutral, and that this has not changed its location.
[ Edit Coulomb: Since about 2014 or 2015, there are only three relays; they omit the inverter relay and have the inverter output always connected to the junction of the two live relays. ]
This is based on the fact that there are still only 4 relays, but one of them has changed from normally-open to changeover. I assume it is the one that was already switching the neutral, and that this has not changed its location.
[ Edit Coulomb: Since about 2014 or 2015, there are only three relays; they omit the inverter relay and have the inverter output always connected to the junction of the two live relays. ]
One of the fathers of MeXy the electric MX-5, along with Coulomb and Newton (Jeff Owen).
- weber
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2936
- Joined: Fri, 23 Jan 2009, 17:27
- Real Name: Dave Keenan
- Location: Brisbane
- Contact:
Re: PIP-4048MS inverter
Here's a table showing all possible relay states.
Unless the state with the question mark is actually used, I can't see the point of the output relay. Can anyone suggest a reason for it?
[Edit: Coulomb sensibly suggests, in the above-linked post: "Perhaps the [output] relay goes off if a short circuit is detected on the load."]
Inverter Safety Output Mode relay relays relay ----------------------------------------- off off off Off off off on (pointless) off on off (pointless) off on on Line mode (not AC charging) on off off (pointless) on off on Battery mode on on off ? (AC charging with loads off?) on on on Line mode (AC charging)
Unless the state with the question mark is actually used, I can't see the point of the output relay. Can anyone suggest a reason for it?
[Edit: Coulomb sensibly suggests, in the above-linked post: "Perhaps the [output] relay goes off if a short circuit is detected on the load."]
One of the fathers of MeXy the electric MX-5, along with Coulomb and Newton (Jeff Owen).
- Tejota
- Noobie
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Tue, 29 Nov 2016, 12:07
- Real Name: MDKTejota
- Location: Spain
- Contact:
Re: PIP-4048MS inverter
Models with 73.00 only connects neutral to earth in battery mode when param 28 is SIG (parallel board inserted) or when there is not parallel board in (not param 28 obviusly).coulomb wrote: ↑Fri, 06 Jul 2018, 07:38
It's true that for models that came with firmware before 73.00, there is no connection from inverter neutral output to earth under any conditions. However, in the models that come with 73.00, there is a new changeover relay that connects the inverter neutral either to earth when in battery mode, or to the AC input neutral otherwise. I can't find anything in the firmware that operates this new relay, so I now assume that the neutral to earth relay switches when the inverter output relay switches. However, the changeover relay seems to have a normally closed connection with earth that changes load nuetral to connect to AC input neutral when the coil is energised. So this new relay connects load neutral to earth when the power is off.
If you put param 28 to PAL, neutral to earth is not connected in any situation: always floating.
I dont know why.
Re: PIP-4048MS inverter
Hey all
Anyone tried the new Axpert VMIII or Axpert King?
I don't expect any problems with it doing what it claims. However I'm curious if the existing communication protocol still works with the newer models.
Apologies if this has been answered before, the thread is quite epic in length.
Anyone tried the new Axpert VMIII or Axpert King?
I don't expect any problems with it doing what it claims. However I'm curious if the existing communication protocol still works with the newer models.
Apologies if this has been answered before, the thread is quite epic in length.
- weber
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2936
- Joined: Fri, 23 Jan 2009, 17:27
- Real Name: Dave Keenan
- Location: Brisbane
- Contact:
Re: PIP-4048MS inverter
We finally got around to promoting patched firmware 73.00c from beta to release. The only thing that changed is the first letter of the version number (the release-status letter) from B to L.
We simply edited the original beta post, which can be found here or via the index post.
We simply edited the original beta post, which can be found here or via the index post.
One of the fathers of MeXy the electric MX-5, along with Coulomb and Newton (Jeff Owen).
Re: PIP-4048MS inverter
Awesome. Great work guys! Much appreciated.weber wrote: ↑Fri, 20 Jul 2018, 14:22 We finally got around to promoting patched firmware 73.00c from beta to release. The only thing that changed is the first letter of the version number (the release-status letter) from B to L.
We simply edited the original beta post, which can be found here or via the index post.